But using algorithms makes the process a lot faster and at a much larger scale. This problem, of course, already exists on a smaller scale since various law enforcement agencies already have tattoo databases. “I think that one of the bigger pictures here is, at what point are scientists going to say, ‘Hey, we should not be engaging in creating the tools that can be used to oppress society’ ?” said Dave Maass, an investigative researcher with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
#Valknut tattoo offensive software
Algorithmic tattoo identification software that falls into the wrong hands could be used for nefarious purposes, such as imprisoning, torturing, or even murdering people for their religion or political beliefs. Coptic Christians, for example, are a widely persecuted group, and some may bear religious tattoos.
#Valknut tattoo offensive free
Algorithmic profiling based on body art also raises significant free speech concerns for members of unpopular political groups, for example, who bear tattoos reflective of their beliefs but aren’t necessarily involved in criminal activity.Īnd then there are religious concerns. That said, misidentification could have a negative impact on people’s lives, whether that’s placing someone in a risk group category based on an out-of-context symbol, or algorithmic profiling errors inaccurately associating people with groups they’re not affiliated with. Segal is quick to note that there is still value in understanding the meaning of symbols since tattoos often provide clues into someone’s motivation (especially when investigating a crime). Furthermore, these algorithms could generate spurious linkages and errors that could flag people with tattoos of culturally or spiritually significant symbols as being members of hate groups. Matching tattoos to other individuals with similar tattoos fared even poorer, with a mean average precision of only 5.2 percent.īut beyond the ethical considerations and accuracy lies the bigger issue: The tattoo-matching program raises significant issues surrounding freedom of expression, freedom of association, and religious liberty. And while technology to establish connections between tattoos and images in other mediums (such as graffiti) is pretty nascent, it’s somewhat alarming that the project’s top-performing algorithm was able to match visually similar images, or related tattoos using non-tattoo imagery, with a mean average precision of only 15.1 percent. There were a host of research-related problems-like the fact that the prisoners and arrestees whose tattoos were included in the massive database were likely not able to give consent.
0 kommentar(er)
